Health & Medical Data Research · Results

What the snapshot has produced.

Every figure on this page was computed from a dated snapshot of public federal data by the published extraction and analysis package, and nothing on this page exists that the snapshot did not produce.

Pending

No figure has been computed yet.

The adverse-event snapshot has not been taken. When it is, this page is regenerated from it: the headline figures, every table and every figure appear here only after the extraction and analysis package has produced them, and the snapshot date is stated beside them. The design and the coding schema are already public on the methods page.

Verified references

What was checked before any data were pulled.

The literature the analysis positions itself against, with every identifier resolved in PubMed on the date shown, and the registered trials with posted results that the trial comparison draws on.

Registered trials with posted results (verified 2026-09-29)
nct idtitlestatusphaseconditionsinterventionssponsorenrollmentstart dateprimary completion datestudy typerobotic gyn relevance
NCT00683293Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a Clinical Randomized Trial Comparing Conventional and Robot-assisted (Da Vinci) TechniquesCOMPLETEDNALaparoscopic Technique no Switch to Open; Duration of Surgery; Intraoperative Complications; Postoperative ComplicationsConventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy; Robot-assisted (Da Vinci) laparoscopic hysterectomyKantonsspital Aarau1002008-112011-09INTERVENTIONALcore: robotic vs lap hysterectomy RCT; conversion and complications are registered outcomes
NCT00895284Laparoscopic Hysterectomy With and Without Robotic Assistance: a Randomized Prospective TrialTERMINATEDPHASE4HysterectomyRobotic hysterectomy; Standard HysterectomyMayo Clinic32007-032011-02INTERVENTIONALcore: robotic vs lap hysterectomy RCT (terminated at n=3)
NCT01526655A Randomized Open Controlled Trial Comparing Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Abdominal Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in a Fast Track ProgramCOMPLETEDNAEndometrial CancerAbdominal total hysterectomy; Robot assisted laparoscopic hysterectomyUniversity Hospital, Linkoeping502012-01-252016-07-27INTERVENTIONALcore: robotic vs open hysterectomy RCT (oncologic)
NCT01556204Laparoscopy vs. Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis (LAROSE): a Prospective Randomized Controlled TrialCOMPLETEDNAEndometriosisRobotic surgery; Laparoscopic SurgeryThe Cleveland Clinic732012-032015-12INTERVENTIONALcore: robotic vs lap endometriosis RCT (covered procedure)
NCT01124916Abdominal Colpopexy: Comparison of Endoscopic Surgical StrategiesCOMPLETEDNAPelvic Organ ProlapseRobotic assisted laparoscopic abdominal sacrocolpopexy; Standard laparoscopic abdominal sacrocolpopexyLoyola University842009-112013-03INTERVENTIONALcore: robotic vs lap sacrocolpopexy RCT (covered procedure)
NCT02676973Three Arm Apical Suspension Trial for Post-Hysterectomy Vault ProlapseACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGNAVisceral ProlapseOpen, Robotic, or Laparoscopic; Transvaginal Native Tissue Repair; Uphold LITENICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network3602016-02-292022-07-28INTERVENTIONALsupporting: robotic arm pooled with open/lap sacral colpopexy
NCT03681223A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Restorelle Y Mesh vs. Vertessa Lite Y Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic SacrocolpopexyCOMPLETEDNAVaginal Vault ProlapseVertessa Lite Y mesh; Restorelle Y mesh; Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy; Robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexyThe Cleveland Clinic1062018-09-182023-12-19INTERVENTIONALsupporting: robotic sacrocolpopexy arm; mesh comparison
NCT02156687A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Restorelle Y Mesh vs. Restorelle Dual Flat Mesh for Laparoscopic and Robotic-assisted Laparoscopic SacrocolpopexyCOMPLETEDNAProlapseY mesh; Dual flat meshThe Cleveland Clinic592014-04-142019-11-07INTERVENTIONALsupporting: robotic sacrocolpopexy arm; mesh comparison
NCT03815344A Randomized Control Trial of Combined Vaginal Misoprostol and Perivascular Vasopressin During Robotic MyomectomyCOMPLETEDPHASE4Leiomyoma; Laparoscopy; Uterine MyomectomyStandard; Standard-vaginal misoprostolAntonios Likourezos742017-04-262019-06-30INTERVENTIONALsupporting: robotic myomectomy setting; drug comparison
NCT02777203Safety and Efficacy of Contained Electromechanical Power Morcellation Systems for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and MyomectomyCOMPLETEDNALeiomyomaEcoSac 400 ECO-TWake Forest University Health Sciences602016-052019-06-30INTERVENTIONALsupporting: morcellation containment in lap/robotic hysterectomy and myomectomy
NCT02352922A Randomized Controlled Trial of Wound Infiltration With Extended-release Versus Short-acting Bupivacaine Before Laparoscopic or Robotic HysterectomyCOMPLETEDPHASE4Pain, Postoperative; Surgical Procedure, UnspecifiedLiposomal Bupivacaine; Bupivacaine HClAdventHealth642015-072016-01INTERVENTIONALperipheral: analgesia trial in robotic hysterectomy setting
NCT04429022Multimodal Pain Management After Robotic-Assisted Total Laparoscopic HysterectomyCOMPLETEDPHASE3Pain, PostoperativeGabapentin; Acetaminophen; Celecoxib; Ketorolac; Paracervical block; port-site ropivacaine; Hydromorphone; OxycodoneState University of New York at Buffalo682020-11-242022-05-31INTERVENTIONALperipheral: analgesia trial in robotic hysterectomy setting
NCT02519023Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) Infiltration vs. Surgical Infiltration of Local Anesthetic in Laparoscopic and Robotic Assisted HysterectomyCOMPLETEDPHASE4Acute PainLiposomal Bupivacaine; Bupivacaine; Ultrasound; Epinephrine; acetaminophen; ibuprofen; OxycodoneUniversity of Minnesota872016-072017-05INTERVENTIONALperipheral: analgesia trial in lap/robotic hysterectomy setting
NCT02289079Ultrasound Guided Subcostal TAP Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine in Robotic Hysterectomy PatientsCOMPLETEDPHASE4Acute PainBupivacaine; liposomal bupivacaineUniversity of Minnesota602013-062014-10INTERVENTIONALperipheral: analgesia trial in robotic hysterectomy setting
NCT03657407Belladonna and Opium Rectal Suppository Effect on Postoperative Pain and Nausea Following Total Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted HysterectomyCOMPLETEDPHASE4Hysterectomy; Pain, PostoperativeBelladonna Opium; Glycerin SuppositoryAnna Reinert562016-06-012017-05-31INTERVENTIONALperipheral: analgesia trial in lap/robotic hysterectomy setting
NCT02449915Does Liposomal Bupivacaine Improve Pain Following Robotic Sacrocolpopexy and Rectocele Repair for Pelvic Organ Prolapse?COMPLETEDPHASE4Pelvic Organ ProlapseBupivacaine; PlaceboTriHealth Inc.702015-032016-08INTERVENTIONALperipheral: analgesia trial in robotic sacrocolpopexy setting
NCT04996251Clinical Effectiveness of Pre-incision Versus Post-incision Local Anesthetic During Laparoscopic/Robotic SacrocolpopexyCOMPLETEDPHASE4Pain, PostoperativeBupivacaine InjectionNorthwell Health1292021-07-302023-05-30INTERVENTIONALperipheral: analgesia trial in lap/robotic sacrocolpopexy setting
NCT05229653Postoperative Single Dose Ketamine on Pain and Recovery After Robotic Removal of Endometriosis in Patients With Chronic Pelvic PainTERMINATEDPHASE1Endometriosis; Post Operative PainKetamine; PlaceboNYU Langone Health12022-04-122022-10-21INTERVENTIONALperipheral: analgesia trial in robotic endometriosis setting (terminated at n=1)
NCT03841513Minimally Invasive Burch Colposuspension to Reduce Occult Stress IncontinenceCOMPLETEDNAPelvic Organ Prolapse; Urinary Incontinence, Stress; Urinary Incontinence, Urge; Bowel Dysfunction; Sexual DysfunctionLaparoscopic Burch ColposuspensionNorthwestern University502019-01-292022-09-27INTERVENTIONALperipheral: MIS prolapse setting; robotic not the intervention
NCT02192606Does 3D Laparoscopy Improve Vaginal Cuff Suture Time? 3D Laparoscopy Versus Standard LaparoscopyCOMPLETEDNAUterine Fibroids; Abnormal Uterine Bleeding; Pelvic Pain; AdenomyosisStorz 3D Laparoscopy System; 2D LaparoscopyBrigham and Women's Hospital572013-112016-08INTERVENTIONALexclude on review: laparoscopic 3D vs 2D; matched on synonym expansion only
NCT01717521The Effects of Intravenous Administration of Ketamine on the Analgesia Nociception Index (ANI) Measured With the PhysioDoloris DeviceCOMPLETEDMonitoring, IntraoperativeUniversity of Washington202012-082012-12OBSERVATIONALexclude on review: anesthesia monitoring; matched on synonym expansion only
Literature register (verified 2026-09-29)
reffirst authoryeartitlejournalvolume issue pagesdoipmidpmcidverified onverified viarole in project
L01Hammadeh BM2026Device-related malfunctions and associated patient harm in robotic-assisted hysterectomy: a 17-year review of the FDA MAUDE databaseJ Robot Surg20(1)10.1007/s11701-026-03537-9422310122026-09-29PubMed (NLM) via connectorNearest prior art. Descriptive, per da Vinci generation, through 2026-03-19; no product-code index, no guidance-aligned coding, no denominator. Cite prominently and differentiate.
L02Fitzgerald AC2026Injuries associated with peritoneal entry device in laparoscopic surgery: an analysis of reports to the FDAJ Minim Invasive Gynecolonline 2026-05-1710.1016/j.jmig.2026.05.009421506502026-09-29PubMed (NLM) via connectorJMIG article within the 12-month window a JMIG Letter must respond to. Closes on 'higher quality post-market device surveillance is needed', which is the hook.
L03Correa J2022Malfunction events in the US FDA MAUDE database: how does robotic gynecologic surgery compare with other specialties?J Minim Invasive Gynecol29(2):300-307.e110.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.021344647612026-09-29PubMed (NLM) via connectorReporter-type finding: gyn events reported by OR staff 2.3% vs 16.1% other specialties (p=.007). Conversion to open 3.1%, lap 1.3% of malfunction events. Source for H3.
L04Manoucheri E2014MAUDE: analysis of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgeryJ Minim Invasive Gynecol21(4):592-59510.1016/j.jmig.2013.12.122244865352026-09-29PubMed (NLM) via connector2006-2012 gyn cohort; 26% injury, 8.5% death among reported events; 15 deaths during planned hysterectomy, 4 from major vessel injury with no narrative on mechanism. Motivates the emergency-access recommendation.
L05Alemzadeh H2016Adverse events in robotic surgery: a retrospective study of 14 years of FDA dataPLoS One11(4):e015147010.1371/journal.pone.015147027097160PMC48382562026-09-29PubMed (NLM) via connector2000-2013 all-specialty NLP analysis; 10.4% of events interrupted the procedure (restart 3.1%, conversion 7.3%, reschedule 2.5%). Only prior paper with a procedure-volume denominator (manufacturer-reported).
L06Gupta P2017Development of a classification scheme for examining adverse events associated with medical devices, specifically the da Vinci Surgical System as reported in the FDA MAUDE databaseJ Endourol31(1):27-3110.1089/end.2016.0396278066372026-09-29PubMed (NLM) via connectorSeverity classification with kappa 0.52 across 14 surgeons; 34% of 2009-2012 events were Ob/Gyn. Precedent for a coded schema with reported inter-rater agreement.
L07Souders C2019Robotic sacrocolpopexy: adverse events reported to the FDA over the last decadeInt Urogynecol J30(11):1919-192310.1007/s00192-018-3845-6306175052026-09-29PubMed (NLM) via connectorProlapse-procedure MAUDE series 2007-2017 (n=334); conversions to open 5.07%, lap 1.3%, aborted 1.3% of malfunctions. Covered-procedure comparator for RQ3.
L08Pierce H2021Patient injuries and malfunctions associated with robotic prostatectomy: review of the manufacturer and user facility device experience databaseJ Robot Surg15(2):179-18510.1007/s11701-020-01088-1323857982026-09-29PubMed (NLM) via connectorNon-gyn comparator: 13.1% of malfunctions led to an aborted case or conversion. Shows the outcome fields we propose are recoverable from narrative only by hand.
What is not here, and why

Results beyond the public comment wait for the journal.

This page carries what the public comment states and what the snapshot computed. The manuscript's text, its figures and any result beyond the comment's headline figures appear here only after the journal article is published, and then as a link to the version of record. Every submission discloses this page.